REMODELLING FINANCING FOR AGRIBUSINESS AND AGRO-PROCESSING - REVIVING RURAL ECONOMIES IN GHANA
Introduction
Mister Chairman, Honorary
President of Fellows, my colleague Fellows, Distinguished Guests, Ladies, and
Gentlemen:
A few weeks ago, I asked my good friend Sam Avaala, who heads a major
plantation business, what had helped a Ghanaian operation become a jewel in the
crown of a global plantation giant when the World Bank in 1975 advised that
Ghana would never be able to rival the productivity of Malaysia in the
cultivation of oil palm. He responded
that the Benso Oil Palm Plantation story so far could be summed up as follows:
First,
Unilever laid a solid foundation of standard operating procedures, including
ethical conduct, good corporate governance, sustainable and responsible
business and production practices, and human resource development.
Second,
the business adopted internationally recognized best practices in agronomy,
including scientific and precision agriculture and husbandry practices such as
rigorous analyses of leaf and soil samples to establish the nutrient levels
present in the soil. These allow BOPP to
prescribe the type and dosage of fertilizers required per palm tree, and the time
required for absorption to address the nutritional needs of the palms.
Third,
the business has prioritised technology and digitised activities across the
plantation starting with a digitised map of the 6,799 hectares broken down into
30 to 40-hectare blocks and a database identifying every block of the
plantation according to the year of planting, production, and yield history, and
harvesting cycles.
The
technological infrastructure includes a drone which to a limited extent is used
for surveillance and an Electronic Plantation Management System(ePMS) which to
a large extent removes errors and fraud associated with human factors. The ePMS provides real-time data on harvested
fruit records, reconciliation of daily production from farm to mill, a biometric
system for daily attendance of harvesters including facial recognition, mapping
the number of bunches harvested to the year of planting, source block and the
harvester, translating to payroll input and block data. This system is new and more comprehensive.
BOPP also operated AKATUA, an automated payroll software, and AFUOM, a farm
production management software developed by SOFT during the Unilever era. These have now been replaced by the ePMS and
SAP.
Ladies and gentlemen, the
story of financing agriculture and agro-processing in Ghana is haunted by many
ghosts and yet here is one enterprise that has thrived; pays good taxes to the
State, is listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange, and is making a difference in its
community through the provision of healthcare, academic and agronomic education,
utilities and other social amenities whilst blazing the trail in terms of clean
energy from two biomass steam turbines that produce 0.5MW and 1MW per hour, respectively.
There is no reason why
such an example of globally competitive agriculture and agro-processing cannot
be the hallmark of farming and value-addition enterprises across Ghana. Even more impressive is the fact that BOPP is
managed by an all-Ghanaian team. Perhaps,
the person you should be listening to is my friend and brother, Mr. Sam Avaala.
The focus of this
presentation could easily have been on the role that good governance,
world-class agronomic practices, and the application of technology, play, can
play and should play in agriculture and agro-processing. However, no farmer or agro-processor in Ghana
today believes they have the space to focus on these critical matters because
the basic need for finance to start and run their farms and businesses remains
largely unmet. The lack of finance is
the reason why much of our agriculture is characterised by uncompetitive,
smallholder farms worked by aged, poor farmers and why our agro-processors
remain small, largely inefficient operations.
Without discounting the
equal primacy of the qualitative drivers that Sam listed, I wish to address
this imperative of finance and how it serves or hinders agriculture and
agro-processing. I will concentrate on
how we can shape finance to work better for farmers and agro-processors. If by God’s grace, there is another opportunity, I will
return to discuss those other critical issues.
The
Problem
The Nature of Agriculture and
Agro-processing in Ghana
Agriculture accounts for
approximately 18% of GDP in Ghana. Apart
from the heydays of cooperative farming from 1960 to 1966, farming in Ghana has
largely been a private-sector venture[1]
generally tagged as Dirty, Difficult, and Dangerous. Ghana still has a largely agrarian,
developing economy founded on smallholder farmers. As is the case in the rest of sub-Saharan
Africa, about a third of these smallholder farmers in Ghana live in poverty[2]. Farmers and agro-processors consistently cite
the restricted access to finance as the main barrier inhibiting the growth of
their enterprises.
The farmer is always the
loser. The first to bear the brunt when
policy shifts go wrong, and the one with the least benefit when everyone else
is smiling. Similarly, agro-processors
often watch helplessly as huge portions of agricultural produce rot or are
discounted and sold to market queens in times of glut whilst their investments
lie idle and their workers remain underemployed or are laid off. So, I add Debt-ridden and Risky to those
perceptions of agriculture and agro processing, yet, BOPP has proven that
agriculture can be rewarding as a business or occupation and agro-processing in
Ghana can be hugely profitable and globally competitive. Indeed, in a 2005 paper titled Africa:
Farming Challenges and the Farmer, Dr Ishmael Yamson wrote:
When
I was in primary school my grandfather paid my fees, purchased my books and my
uniforms and my siblings and I ate three meals a day. After 50 years, the state has to pay the
fees, provide the books, and in some cases feed the children because the farmer
can no longer afford these things following the long period of state
exploitation and impoverishment of our rural people.
My following remarks will
attempt to decipher the reasons for the limitations that farmers and
agro-processors face in accessing finance, the solutions attempted by
stakeholders, what we may learn from other developing economies, and the
opportunities to change our fortunes with innovative solutions.
The Industry Inhibitors
First, let me deal
briefly with the global context. The global financial structure around
agriculture and agro-processing does not favour countries like Ghana. The G20 account for nearly all of the US$640 billion[3]
annual spend on subsidies to agricultural producers, most of which is used in a
manner that distorts markets through production-linked support to farmers and big agribusiness.
These then depress prices of agro products worldwide. Ghanaian farmers then find that they cannot
produce crops at prices that compete with such heavily subsidised produce. The problem then rolls onto agro-processors
who are unable to source local maize, rice, tomato, sugarcane, and other produce
at prices that allow them to make the value-added industrial and consumer
products that would generate jobs and save this country a stack of millions in
import dollars. The complaints of
countries like Ghana to the World Trade Organisation about this have been
upheld but reform of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and US farm policy is
painfully slow.
Second, I will look at
Ghana’s financial sector. Though we have
one of the most developed financial sectors in West Africa, agriculture and agro-processing are viewed
as too risky, and therefore credit and insurance facilities are limited,
restrictive, and costly. The Bank of
Ghana requires that 50% of loans disbursed by rural banks fund agriculture,
however, this mandate is not enforced. Additionally, of the 87% of lending in
Ghana that comes from commercial banks, less than 4%[4] of
these loans are made to agri-businesses, some with a requirement for borrowers
to pledge collateral equal to 100% of the loan amount. The bulk of that lending, in any case, goes to large
commercial farmers.
Financial institutions go on to cite a long list[5] of rational business calculations for being reluctant to lend to agriculture and agro-processing including, the:
a.
Farm Industry
Characteristics
○
Lack of documentation and registered collateral
required for loans;
○
Low levels of farmer education and financial literacy;
○
Perennial underperformance of agriculture and
agro-processing
○
Existential risks such as diseases, pests, and changes
in climatic factors;
then there are the
b. Financial Sector Prejudices
○
High-risk perception of the sector and lack of adequate
risk management tools;
○
Agriculture and agro-processing not seen as
strategically important for their success;
○
The perceived low-profit potential of agriculture;
○
The inappropriate financing models applied by
commercial banks for agricultural lending due to poor understanding of
agribusiness; and
○
The lack of reach by banks and the high service
delivery and monitoring costs in rural areas;
Addressing these are key
to making the financial incentives effective in attracting capital to
agriculture and agro-processing once again.
However, those who are passionate about agriculture and agro-processing
will add that there are;
c.
Structural and
Institutional Deficiencies in Agriculture Financing
○
The inability of financial institutions to
appropriately assess the creditworthiness of farmers and agro-processors using
specialised diagnostic tools and credit information to mitigate risks.
○
The absence of basic, affordable financial and
insurance products to serve agriculture and agro-processing;
○
The absence of fiscal incentives and legal mechanisms
to attract, direct and reward finance from the financial sector and food
importers;
○
The absence of fiscal incentives for private
investments by corporates and individuals to de-risk and finance
agribusinesses; and
○
The weak collaboration between sector ministries to
harness synergies, reduce overlaps, and better coordinate initiatives targeted at
farmers and agro-processors.
In rural Ghana where many
agricultural and agro-processing enterprises are located, only about 38% of
people have some form of bank or mobile wallet account. We cannot say the market does not exist for
financial products to rejuvenate our agriculture and agro-processing
industry. In the absence of policy
determination to facilitate the private sector contribution to making finance
work for agriculture and agro-processing, farmers and agro-processors will
continue to be confronted by an unforgiving, complex, and multi-layered reality
characterised by;
▪
a dysfunctional relationship with capital and finance
sources,
▪
the role and power of the aggregators and other supply
chain actors in the middle markets,
▪
the lack of access to markets, and finally
▪
the power of markets over farmers.
The third reason for the
restricted access to finance for agriculture and agro-processing is the inconsistent, uncoordinated, unfocused,
unstructured, and half-hearted execution of policies over successive
Administrations. Today, Africa has
the highest levels of underutilized and underdeveloped agricultural land
worldwide. Agricultural land in Ghana
stands at about 57% (12.9 Ha million) of the land area[6]. The government made a commitment at the
Second Ordinary Assembly of the African Union in July 2003 along with other AU
Members to implement “the allocation of at least 10% of national budgetary
resources to agriculture and rural development policy implementation within five
years”.
Government has not put
its money where its mouth is. On
November 2nd 2021, the Peasant Farmers Association of Ghana (PFAG) asked the
Government to allocate a minimum of 10% of its budgetary allocation to the
agriculture sector in the 2022 budget noting that budgetary allocation in 2021
for agriculture was less than 5% of the total and woefully inadequate to
implement the many policies of the government.
Land devoted to agriculture has expanded by about 176% from 1.7Ha
million in 1961 to 4.7Ha million in 2018[7]. That still means only a little over
one-third of the potential agricultural land[8] has
been put to productive use. To achieve
the radical expansion of commercialised agricultural land, the onus is on the
Government to fulfill the 2003 declaration.
The fourth issue to be
resolved is the absence of a
consistently well-financed agenda to create a self-reinforcing virtuous cycle
of growth centred around increases in agricultural productivity and
agro-processing to increase sustainable jobs. Successive governments have not invested
sufficiently in extension services, soil fertility management, cutting-edge
mechanisation, pest and disease control, and other public goods such as quality
electricity supply, durable highways, and other utilities in support of
agriculture and the agro-processing industries.
The perception that agriculture and agro-processing are Dirty,
Difficult, Dangerous; Debt-ridden, and Risky remain because we have not as in
Europe, Northern America, and elsewhere funded a government-assisted but
private-sector-led expansion to catalyse the creation and growth of allied
services and industries.
This leads me to my fifth
point that the architecture of our
agriculture has not encouraged strong linkages between agro-processors and
farms. Just as smallholder farms
struggle to raise credit, small and medium-sized agro-processors are
unattractive to banks because they are unable to aggregate the large volumes
and the quality of raw materials required to be viable. Some local agro-processors can only source
about 30% of their raw material requirements locally. Indeed, the Ghana Industrial Policy document
notes and I paraphrase, that,
“despite
the favourable climatic and soil conditions for agriculture, major local raw
material supplies are inadequate and costly, and local manufacturers have to
rely on imported raw materials. The agro-processing industry continues to
suffer from an inconsistent and inadequate supply of local raw materials.”
The situation at BOPP
where the business combines the financing required for its nucleus farm with
that of the smallholders who supply its mills to acquire favourably structured
financing at low rates of interest is rare.
However, agriculture can only respond to industry needs and unprofitable
agro-processors can only benefit from the support of the financial sector when
they are able to integrate their supply chains and financial strategies.
The Underdeveloped Agri-Insurance
Market
The Crop Insurance
Feasibility Study in 2010 on behalf of the National Insurance Commission and
the gtz suggests that the foundational problem inhibiting the development of an
agri-insurance market lies in a two-part vicious cycle:
-
first, farmers do not demand insurance because they
lack access to finance to create viable businesses; and
-
on the other hand, buying insurance has not guaranteed
them access to finance.
Proof of the resultant
low uptake of agri-insurance products can be seen in the National Financial
Inclusion and Development Strategy: 2018–2023 for Ghana which reveals that in
2016, only 4’785 agri-insurance policies existed in a country with over 12
million citizens involved in agriculture.
Depressingly, the targets for 2020 and 2023 were only 50,000 and 100,000
respectively but actual data from GAIP suggests that even those modest targets
will not be met[9].
Those who are the solution to our food security, food independence, industrial and jobs growth have low financial literacy and little incentive to buy insurance or take on loans as long as insurance premiums and interest rates for smallholder farmers who are dependent on rain-fed agriculture and small scale agro-processors remain exorbitant because of the inhibitors and prejudices outlined above. What is required are robust public-private partnerships to create attractive products in a competitive market suited to the development of agri-business.
What
Exists
Available Agric Financing Programs
in Ghana
I take this opportunity
to commend successive governments, the Bank of Ghana, and our development
partners for the implementation of initiatives - dating as far back as the
First Republic of Ghana. These efforts
have provided rural farmers and agricultural SMEs with better access to finance
in order that they thrive. I will talk through a few of the recent ones.
1.
THE GHANA EXIM BANK[10], established by the
consolidation of three state-owned institutions, has been a key financier of
the 1D1F programme - providing a total of ¢417 million support to the initiative. The
Ekumfi Fruits and Juices Limited (¢7.7m funding support)[11],
Casa de Ropa (¢14.4m funding
support), Darko Farms (¢22.1m funding support)[12]
and the Shea Empowerment
Initiative (¢10m
funding support)[13]
are amongst the 135 agricultural and agro-processing beneficiary SMEs.
2.
THE FINANCING GHANAIAN
AGRICULTURE PROJECT (FinGAP), initiated by USAID, also supported small, medium, and large enterprises (SMiLEs) operating
in the maize, rice, and soy (MRS) value chains in northern Ghana to receive direct support
from Business Advisory Service (BAS) providers and access financing at a relatively low cost from Financial
Institutions. The Project provided risk mitigation tools such as crop or
weather insurance, partial credit guarantees, and capacity building
opportunities to selected financial institutions in order to incentivise those
institutions to offer credit tailored to suit the needs of agribusinesses in
the targeted value chains. The
investment of over US$115
million[14]
has significantly impacted the business growth, profitability, and livelihoods
of over 2,846 agribusinesses
and 62,000 smallholder
farmers.[15]
3.
THE RURAL AND
AGRICULTURAL FINANCING PROGRAM (RAFIP)[16],
expended
US$ 29.78 million to consolidate
the accomplishments of the Rural Finance Support Programme previously financed
by IFAD and improve access to sustainable financial services in rural and
agricultural communities through enhanced outreach and linkages. From 2008 to 2016, it trained and registered 60 farmer
groups as cooperatives, provided 876 farmers with loans, trained 14,774 farmers
on the importance of agricultural credit and micro-insurance, equipped 15
community banks with computers and financial management software for effective
data management, and registered 22 credit unions with the Credit Union
Association of Ghana.
4.
THE GHANA INCENTIVE-BASED
RISK SHARING SYSTEM FOR AGRICULTURAL LENDING
(GIRSAL)[17], is a private non-bank financial institution capitalised
with ¢200 million and
US$14 million by the government to de-risk agricultural financing by financial
institutions and enhance the total amount of credit to the agricultural and
agribusiness sectors through the issuance of agricultural credit guarantee
instruments.
5.
THE OUTGROWER AND VALUE
CHAIN FUND (OVCF)[18] is fulfilling the goal
of providing low-interest medium to long-term loans to commercially viable
value chains and out-grower schemes. It has financed farmers engaged in
cultivating eight (8) selected value chains covering; oil palm, rubber, cocoa,
maize for poultry, cassava for gari, soya-sorghum-maize, pineapple, and rice,
with a sum of €33 million. 4,610 farmers
and eight (8) Technical Operators have so far benefited from the Fund.
6.
THE PLANTING FOR FOOD AND
JOBS (PFJ) PROGRAMME[19], through various funding
measures such as the supply of improved seeds at a 50% discount, the supply of
50% subsidised fertiliser, and the provision of free extension services reports
that in 2020 alone PFJ supported up to 1,700,000[20]
farmers enrolled across the country under its five (5) modules[21],
namely;
●
Food Crops;
●
Planting for Export and Rural Development;
●
Greenhouse Technology Villages;
●
Rearing for Food and Jobs; and
●
Agricultural Mechanization Services.
7.
THE FEED THE FUTURE GHANA
“MOBILIZING FINANCE IN AGRICULTURE”
(MFA)[22], is a $19 million USAID
program running from 2020 to 2024 to address the market failures limiting
access to finance by smallholder farmers engaged in seven key value chains in
the Northern, North East, Upper East, and Upper West Regions of Ghana. The project is helping finance
agriculture in three ways:
a.
by expanding the
existing sources of finance,
b. finding new sources of finance, and
c.
partnering with
investors, associations, tech firms, and financial institutions to access
finance.
Over the course of its lifespan, it is expected to
achieve amongst others:
● the mobilisation of $261
million agricultural financing in debt and equity from capital markets for the
target value chains; maize, soy, cowpea, groundnut, and other high-value crops,
in priority geographical areas;
● directly support 81,493
M-SMiLEs in accessing financing, business management services, or other
technical assistance from program stakeholders;
● the development of ten
(10) new loan products for agriculture;
● 2% average reduction in
agribusiness finance interest rates charged by supported Financial
Institutions;
● 25% average reduction in
agribusiness financing turnaround time for supported Financial Institutions;
and
● extending the average
tenor of loans for agribusiness by 12 months
8.
Lastly is the
establishment of the GHANA AGRICULTURAL
INSURANCE POOL (GAIP)[23]
to protect farmers and other players in Ghana’s agricultural industry from the
negative economic effects of climate change and perils associated with
agriculture and agribusiness. The Pool, with insurance being provided by 15
Ghanaian insurance firms and 1 local reinsurance company, has developed a
portfolio of innovative insurance products including the:
a.
drought index
insurance,
b. multi-peril crop insurance,
c.
poultry insurance,
and
d. area yield insurance
to help mitigate the
financial risks associated with extreme weather events and other forms of
climate change. GAIP also plans to roll out new insurance products such as
livestock insurance for commercial farmers.
A lot has been done but
there is more to do because the initiatives have been staggered and not
executed in a coordinated manner.
Consequently, agriculture and agro-processing remain moribund.
Are
there lessons anywhere and what was achieved?
Elsewhere on the African
continent, governments and development partners including the African Development Bank, USAID,
The German Development Bank
(KfW), ICCO, The European Commission, DFID, JICA, The Alliance for a
Green Revolution for Africa (AGRA),
Mastercard Foundation, the Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation and the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa, have
supported many initiatives[24]
in a quest to solve problems that we have to address in Ghana as well.
One, the Strengthening
African Rural Smallholders (STARS)[25]
programme for example addressed challenges such as poor farming techniques,
lack of credit, minimal access to markets, and limited access to appropriate
financial products, that smallholder farmers in rural Ethiopia, Burkina Faso,
Rwanda and Senegal faced. 22 partner
microfinance institutions (MFIs) in the four countries, developed, tested and
rolled out 20 tailor-made credit products using a bespoke solution - the
Agriculture Credit Assessment Tool (A-CAT).
The STARS programme equipped the risk management committees within MFIs
to manage agri-finance products and evaluate their risks using the A-CAT[26]. The programme supported all 22 MFIs to
attract more funding through business plan development, international brokering
and B2B networking. As part of its
savings mobilization strategy, the STARS programme also supported MFIs to
develop more savings products.
In Rwanda, a major policy
reform on agriculture finance[27]
- the land tenure regularisation program, has resulted in the formal
registration of farmers’ titles to lands and enabled several rural farmers to
use their lands as collateral for loans.
What
Ghanaian Farmers and Agro-processors require
In spite of the efforts of the Government, development partners, and the financial sector over decades, resolving the bedeviling issue of poor
access to capital for small and medium-scale agribusinesses remains. Agri-businesses require radical and innovative
collaboration between the financial
sector, government, private investors, and development partners to create a mix of financial and insurance product
innovations to support their short, medium, and long term needs for capital
and risk mitigation. Ghana must leverage
its financial sector to minimise the riskiness of loans and insurance policies
for agriculture and agro-processing and improve the share of loans that pass
from commercial and rural banks to agriculture and agro-processing.
Another area of agribusinesses where operators struggle to
secure credit facilitation and actual loans for their operations is knowledge transfer covering the need
for;
●
Extension Support and Education,
●
Business Support Services (incl. general management
training)
●
Irrigation Development
●
Production Support
●
Market Development
●
Postharvest and other Infrastructure management, and
●
Training
Without the transfer of enhanced knowledge, we are guaranteed
unproductive farmers and agro-processors but this discussion is currently not
on any table. Innovation is required to
facilitate these investments in knowledge transfer in agriculture, aquaculture,
animal husbandry, and agro-processing enterprises. This list of the knowledge
base that farmers and agro-processors need funding to acquire shows just how
much work remains to be done by the financial sector players to help
agri-businesses expand their farms and supply bases, agro-processing
operations, improve productivity and grow sustainably.
Securing bridge finance is specifically needed to cover
working capital requirements for up to 18 months to help farmers of biannual
and annual crops and livestock acquire fertilizers, pesticides, feed, and
fodder; market agricultural produce and pay the wages of hired labour among others.
Agro-processors on the other hand, seek such short-term finance to source raw
materials, production consumables, and supply chain logistics.
Additionally, medium-term financing is also required to
support the consolidation of growth by providing the means to fund expansion
including the purchase of livestock or seedlings for perennial crops, basic
agricultural equipment; the cost of repair and maintenance of key assets, and
buying technology to enhance efficiency and productivity. For agro-processors, such financing must be
designed to help them acquire basic production equipment that can be paid off
over an 18-to-36-month period with a short grace period to enable the
investments and the employee exposed to the new technologies to be synchronised
and become productive.
Perhaps the most difficult and yet the most important
innovation in financing products that farmers and agro-processors ask for is
patient capital. Agri-businesses need
partners who are willing to factor in a significant moratorium period after
which agri-businesses can make repayments over 36 to 84 months. This is the best way to ensure long term
investments to improve soil fertility, construct infrastructure on farms,
purchase complex agriculture machinery like tractors, harvesters, initiate new
or expand existing projects which require heavy capital outlays or have long
gestation periods and repay old inappropriate shorter-term debts.
Innovative medium to long term financial and insurance
models that are transforming agricultural finance elsewhere and can similarly
be adopted or more broadly applied include:
●
The Agricultural Value
Chain Finance (AVCF) leverages the role of off-takers within the value chain related to
a farmer’s produce/enterprise to enable farmers to secure credit based on their estimated future
income. Participating Banks rely on the
existence of buyer contracts as security for issuing loans supported with loan
guarantees, mentorship services, and capacity development.
●
Collateral Management
Agreements
allow farmers to obtain loans from a bank using produce with long storage life as collateral. The produce is only released by a custodian
(usually a warehouse operator) upon Notice to the custodian by the bank, of the
farmer’s repayment of the loan.
●
Equipment Financing encourages smallholder
farmers to consolidate their capital expenditure requirement to secure loans
for the purchase of movable assets that are then used as collateral for the
loan. Often, there is a close
collaboration between the equipment suppliers and the bank. The relationship is
further enriched where an agro-processor is a party to the transaction as an
off-taker.
●
Leasing grants access to the use
of equipment to farmers and agricultural SMEs by the asset owners at
predetermined times in exchange for periodic payments to the equipment owner,
without an eventual transfer of ownership of the asset to the farmer or SME.
This model of financing focuses on the value that farmers can generate through
the use of the asset, without any recourse to their past credit
history.
●
Factoring: benefits farmers by
formalising a common practice where they discount the estimated value of their
harvest and exchange it for financial support from a financier. While this has long been the preserve of
market queens and aggregators, the involvement of financial institutions will
help what has been a vicious loan-sharking regime.
The question is what will make the financial service providers
take notice of these opportunities?
What
Capital Providers Require in Ghana
Agricredit has collapsed
relative to the rest of the economy
Credit to agriculture forestry and fishing in Ghana[28]
increased from US$75.3 million in 1997 to US$502.95 million in 2019 however the
value of credit to agriculture has dropped from about 2% of GDP to less than 1%
in that time.
Our experience has shown that Ghanaian capital providers have a
risk-aversion toward agriculture and agro-processing that generates a
requirement for certain critical assurances over and above the norms required
to fund traders and importers. The
response to the high-risk perception of agriculture and agro-processions should
provide at least these three critical conditions:
Credibility on the part
of agro-processors and farmers that will create certainty about the
recoverability of loans;
The terms[29]
that one bank asks from farmers who need short-term credit to pay input costs
are:
-
Business registration documents
-
Six months’ statements from another bank
-
Three years’ financial statements and cash flows
-
Collateral (as may be required)
-
Favourable credit bureau report
Not many smallholder farmers will get that loan. Happily, the elements for the structural
realignment required to justify the allocation of resources to develop
innovations are in place. Policy and
law-makers must:
-
Make farmers and
agro-processors known
By leveraging spatial mapping data,
developments in land title registration and National Identification to tie
every parcel of land to an owner and whoever farms it to give lenders and
insurers more confidence to become active in providing financial solutions to
agriculture and agro-processing
Institutional support
such as a clear strategic agenda and activation framework; and
The solution will require a hard-nosed remodeling of
the structure of finance for our agriculture and agro-processing and the fiscal
incentives, including targeted subsidies, to encourage private sector financing
of agriculture. The first action is what
Benjamin Adjei, Head of Programmes at the Food and Agriculture Organisation of
the UN (FAO) told Oxford Business Group[30]
(OBG);
‘‘The government should find a way to meet the farmers
halfway on loans. They should consider providing loan assurances or assistance
in paying off some interest.[31]’’
Policy-backing that
provides some amount of guarantees to de-risk the funding going into
agriculture and agro-processing is required
To do that, the Government must reduce the risk to the
financial sector for backing agriculture and agro-processors and the path to
that must involve credit and insurance providers. The first step is to leverage the
relationship between agro-processors and farmers.
When Wilmar International took over the Unilever
operations at BOPP an important change occurred. For Wilmar, the plantation business is a core
business and it backed BOPP with passion, enhanced funding, innovation,
technology, and world-class technical management. As a country, we should treat agriculture in
the same way - as the core to the success of the transformation of the economy
just as Malaysia and Vietnam did - and back it with passion, enhanced funding,
innovation, technology, and world-class technical management.
Credit and insurance providers require Government to:
- Help farmers and agro-processors to scale up
promoting
the concept of farmer-and-agro-processors working together in cooperatives will
enable agribusinesses to consolidate their financing needs for financial
institutions to support with loans backed by insurance guarantees,
additionally, government must
-
Promote value-chain
integration between farms and agro-processors
by introducing mandates
which require that insurance-backed loans for farmers are tied to off-taker
contracts with agro-processors to improve the likelihood that loans will not
become non-performing.
These elements should be factored into our strategies to then
provide capital lenders and insurers with the confidence to make available
medium to long-term capital for agribusiness.
What
are the opportunities in Ghana for a change in the fortunes of agribusiness?
By conservative estimates[32],
the population of Ghana will grow by 67% from 31 million[33] to
52[34]
million by 2050 in a world of 9.8 billion people up from 7.8 billion in 2020[35]. That growth will create opportunities for an
estimated US$5.8 trillion[36]
of investments in agriculture over the coming three decades. To keep up with the pace of estimated global
investments on a pro-rata basis, Ghana must plan to raise and deploy at
least US$31 billion[37]
in the agriculture and agro-processing sectors during the same period – about
US$1 billion a year.
Looking at the structure of the financial sector relative to its
interaction with farmers and agro-processors, there are at least three bold
options for consideration that I would hazard have been considered before and
not activated because they are daunting avenues though they promise a
revolution in agri-finance and insurance.
First, MoFA, the Bank of Ghana and MoFEP must coordinate the implementation of
a framework by which local self-help organisations, credit unions, and rural
banks could collaborate with commercial banks and insurers to co-develop product innovations for agriculture
and agro-processing. The aim would
be to minimise risk to the formal sector players, and incentivise beneficiary
farmers and agro-processors with appropriate carrots and sticks to motivate
good behaviour.
Second, bold action would require policy and legal reforms aimed at
facilitating the creation of mergers
and/or JVs and/or SPVs between commercial banks and insurers on one hand, and
credit unions and rural banks on the other to enable a more appropriate and
effective outreach and service by commercial banks and insurers who have the
financial muscle and which leverages the local knowledge and operational
know-how of the community-based financial institutions. Today that is simply undone, but it should be
possible.
Again, the government can implement finance and insurance policy
reform to attract private individual and corporate investment in bundled agri-finance and agriculture insurance products
such as agri-bonds issued at rates competitive to treasury bills or bonds
depending on the type and term of investments.
This would be a new collaboration between the government, the commercial
banks, and insurers alongside community-based financial institutions. Such collaborations would facilitate
potential and current non-institutional players such as money lenders,
landlords, trade and commission agents, relatives, and friends among others, to
consolidate finance for agribusiness in new credit vehicles insulated through
guarantees and insurance policies.
Through GAIP, the ministries of Finance and Agriculture; and the
relevant partner agencies of Government should collaborate to:
-
finance and roll out a government-backed agriculture
insurance subsidy program to support private agricultural insurance schemes for
all farmers who are able to join cooperatives at the district level with the
incentive of input subsidies tied to their insurance;
-
resource the Ghana Incentive-Based and Risk Sharing
System for Agric Lending (GIRSAL)
to raise its guarantee for risks associated with lending and providing insurance
cover to agriculture and agribusiness to at least 80% and work to ensure all
the other mitigators of waste and losses are in place to reduce Government’s
and GIRSAL’s risk;
-
link an efficient warehouse receipting system with the
commodity exchange program.
-
streamline the security required for accessing credit
by enhancing farmer traceability through legislation and the agriculture
census data; and
-
implement an integrated farmer collateral registry that
aligns the existing BoG collateral registry with an insurance collateral system
to allow insured farmers to use their policies as collateral for credit.
In terms of focus, the
Government should also decide on its priorities to direct credit to strategic
agriculture and agribusiness activities and kick off the plan of action to
invest at least US$1 billion in agriculture annually. The investment measures
can include:
-
cutting the cost of credit to primary agriculture and
agribusiness with an injection of at least GH¢500 million into the banking and
insurance industries to support lending at a capped rate below government’s
borrowing from the capital market
-
investing at least GH¢200 million per annum to improve
credit to strategic agriculture, agribusiness activities, and related
infrastructure through the Exim Bank
-
dedicating at least 20% of the Ghana Infrastructure
Investment Fund to agricultural and agribusiness infrastructure (US$330 million)
In
conclusion...
Though the conversation
cannot be exhausted today, it is obvious that every player looks to the
Government to take the lead to minimise the risk to creditors and insurers in
providing credit for agriculture and agribusiness.
Notwithstanding the
current low level of financial resources devoted to agriculture and
agro-processing, the options outlined present an opportunity for Ghana to make
bold decisions to transform the architecture of our economy to one that is
agriculture-centred and driven for the obvious reason of creating larger,
better-quality reservoirs of;
a.
Human Capital anchored on sustainable job creation and
lifetime skills development in agribusiness and allied industries,
b. Diversified Revenue based
on developing robust services, science, and technology sub-sectors related to
agribusiness and agro-processing,
c.
Stable Long-term Economic Growth built on a
well-integrated and resilient domestic economy, and finally,
d. Competitive Advantage in
agriculture as the basis for a more sustainable market development drive for
Ghana’s export potential as we become more integrated into the regional and
global economy.
Mr Chairman, Ladies, and
Gentlemen, Vietnam took only a decade to transform its rural agriculture and
fishery industry into a world-class sustainable engine to fuel its economic
transformation and growth. Vietnam, a
country devastated by war by the close of 1979 is today an upper-middle-class
income economy. The Vietnamese
leadership believed they could use agriculture and agro-processing to transform
their very large population to upper-middle-income status. They backed the vision with passion, enhanced
funding, innovation, technology and world-class technical management. We
already know the story of Malaysia and what they have done with a single crop -
oil palm.
We can do the same in
Ghana.
I thank you for your
attention.
[1]
https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/36750/340.pdf?sequence=1
[2] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations). Family Farming Knowledge Platform. “Smallholders
data-portrait” 2005-2013
[3]
https://www.g20-insights.org/policy_briefs/repurposing-agricultural-policy-support-for-climate-change-mitigation-and-adaptation/
[4]
https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/looking-lend-sector-rolling-out-series-financial-tools-help-meet-its-growth-potential
[5]
https://www.afi-global.org/sites/default/files/publications/2018-12/Case%20Study_Agricultural%20Finance%20Interventions%20in%20Ghana_Final.pdf
[6]
https://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index/en/?iso3=GHA
[7]
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/GHA/ghana/arable-land
[8]
https://www.fao.org/ghana/fao-in-ghana/ghana-at-a-glance/en/
[9]
https://agricultureandfoodsecurity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40066-021-00292-y/figures/1
[11] https://www.graphic.com.gh/news/general-news/ekumfi-fruits-juices-company-receives-gh-7-7m-financing.html
[14] http://www.businessghana.com/site/news/Business/143476/USAID-FinGAP%20facilitates%20%24115m%20in%20agric%20value%20chain
[15] https://www.modernghana.com/news/847085/usaid-supports-access-to-alternative-forms-of-financing.html
[16] https://www.ifad.org/en/web/operations/-/project/1100001428#:~:text=Rural%20and%20Agricultural%20Finance%20Programme%20Implemented%20by%20the,financial%20services%2C%20technical%20assistance%20and%20risk%20management%20instruments.
[23] https://gaip-info.com/
[24] Like The Council on Smallholder
Agriculture Finance (CSAF), Lending for African Farming Company (LAFCo), Fund
for Rural Prosperity
[25] https://beamexchange.org/uploads/filer_public/d9/64/d9641b77-e4e8-4fd5-bdc7-d1b3b3deb5f6/cordaid_stars_glossy.pdf
[26] https://www.icco-cooperation.org/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/08/Cordaid-STARS-Glossy.pdf
[27] https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/30453/129841-10-9-2018-10-56-5-AgricultureFinanceDiagnosticreportFinalLowRes.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
[28]
https://knoema.com/FAOINVCRA2017Dec/credit-to-agriculture?country=1000460-ghana
[29]
https://www.stanbicbank.com.gh/ghana/business/products-and-services/borrow-for-your-needs/agricultural-production-loan
[30]
https://oxfordbusinessgroup.com/overview/looking-lend-sector-rolling-out-series-financial-tools-help-meet-its-growth-potential
[31] https://www.google.com/search?q=institutional+and+non+institutional+sources+of+agricultural+finance&sxsrf=AOaemvIpDW85MSwfmUax1So_bYEbbtN1DQ:1635846583424&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi4pou0s_nzAhU9if0HHer4DeMQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1366&bih=663&dpr=1#imgrc=URhWdo3_yipBuM
https://www.economicsdiscussion.net/notes/notes-on-agricultural-finance-and-marketing/2106
[32] Ghana Population Prospects: https://www2.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/2010phc/Mono/Ghana%20Population%20Prospects.pdf
[33]
https://interactives.prb.org/2020-wpds/africa/#western-africa
[34]
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ghana-population/ ;
https://public.knoema.com/erdvvie/population-estimates-and-projections?country=1001940-ghana
[35] The 2020 World Population Data Sheet:
https://interactives.prb.org/2020-wpds/
[36] Unlocking access to finance for
agribusiness through innovation:
https://www.inspirafarms.com/whats-new-unlocking-access-finance-agribusiness-innovation/
[37] Unlocking access to finance for
agribusiness through innovation:
https://www.inspirafarms.com/whats-new-unlocking-access-finance-agribusiness-innovation/
Labels: Agriculture Finance